Search for: "State v. Tripp"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:46 pm
The petitioners also place reliance upon a report by Special Referee Tripp in Matter of Leahy v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:04 am
State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
The last case of the March argument session, Bullard v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:19 am
We agree that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction over the parcels held in trust by the United States and affirm. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
KG v Stokke A/S, in which the dispute centered around children's chairs. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
At present, there is no common standard for copyright protection within the EU, so little prospect of pan-European relief for copyright infringement, whereas trade mark law offers far better prospects of such relief,Functionality of protectable subject matter came next, with discussion focusing on the ruling of the Court of Justice ruling in the TRIPP TRAPP case [Case C-205/13 Hauck v Stokke, noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm
Trippe Hawthorne Act 759 of 2014 updated and amended a number of aspects of Louisiana’s Public Bid Law, set out at La. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
" A spot of sparring in the States. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
On Patinformatics, Anthony Trippe does some investigation of his own. [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:33 pm
University of State of N.Y. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:29 pm
In construing a constitution or any part of it, a court should look to the law as it existed at the time it was adopted s held in Matrox v United States. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:25 pm
A court is not required to wait for the natural guardians to appear before appointing a guardian ad litem if to do so would constitute a danger to the infant's interests as held in Trippe v Trippe, Matter of Thomas and Matter of Beyer. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:28 pm
The appellants contend, on the other hand, that the order appointing the guardian was improper, that a fetus of less than 24 weeks' gestation is not a person within the constitutional protections and that a woman has a constitutional right to choose whether to bear a child, which may not be restricted in the absence of a compelling state interest. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:06 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:38 am
The Supreme Court in New York County, New York recently addressed this question in Tripp & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Alice v. [read post]
