Search for: "State v. Trivett"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Citing U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:21 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:43 am
James Pohl starts Wednesday’s brief session begins with a summary of where things stand in the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:17 am
This Court determined in Trivette v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:13 am
Trivett says he’ll consult with co-counsel and try to clarify. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
Conceding that no cases were directly on point, Connell cites United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm
“I think that that’s unknowable,” Trivett says in reference to whether Baluchi will actually be housed at Camp VII, though Judge Pohl counters that it would be highly likely, especially given the travel ban for detainees to the United States. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:55 am
For the United States, Clay Trivett, Robert Swann, Edward Ryan and Major Christopher of the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Clayton Trivett, representing trial counsel, argued for a return to rules existing before revisions were made to rule 3.5.1 on March 1, 2017. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am
Prosecution team member Clay Trivett explains that they are “not asking for [the defense’s] argument slides,” but rather notice about the exhibits with adequate time to prepare. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
Under Crawford v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]