Search for: "State v. Tui " Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2013, 8:41 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
On 14 November 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Armin Maletic and Marianne Maletic v lastminute.com GmbH and TUI Österreich GmbH. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 11:11 am by Thomas Burke
  The individual defendant served as TUI’s President from 2004 to 2021 and as TUI’s Executive Vice President thereafter. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am by Shannon O'Hare
Otherwise, they would be facing administrative or criminal proceedings under the laws of each Member State. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
According to US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, the sanctions were issued “for the sale and transport of Venezuela’s crude oil” which violated the existing US sanctions on PDVSA. [read post]