Search for: "State v. Tunick"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
You can read the case in its entirety at: Tunick v Shaw [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:10 am
In a case involving a forged Picasso print (David Tunick, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:43 pm
It's a lawsuit by the San Diego Unified School District against the State of California, so there are big players involved. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 6:37 am
Recently, in Mace v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
Tunick, 60 N.Y.S.3d 314 (2d Dep’t 2017). [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am
Which is why last summer’s decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department in Mace v Tunick was such an eye opener. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:03 am
This year’s list includes seven noteworthy appellate decisions, two of which — Mace v Tunick and Shapiro v Ettenson — are poised to have major impact on future operating agreements and business divorce cases involving LLCs. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am
Mace v Tunick The analysis got more complicated in the wake of the Appellate Division, Second Department’s 2017 decision in the Mace v Tunick case that I wrote about here and here. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
Another is Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484, 10 N.Y.S.3d 2 [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am
They also argued that the complaint’s allegations of oppressive conduct by the siblings, while relevant under the statute governing judicial dissolution of a closely held corporation, have no application under § 702 as per cases such as Doyle v Icon and Matter of Kassab. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 4:29 am
” Harkening back to the same court’s holding two months earlier in Mace v Tunick, 153 AD 689, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 (2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017), written about here, the court noted that the stated purpose of the LLC was “to purchase and sell residential and commercial real estate,” yet there was no allegation in the petition that the management of the LLC was unwilling or unable to achieve this purpose. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
Chancery Court Summarily Orders Dissolution of Deadlocked LLC GR US Licensing, LP v Seibel, Mem. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
Chancery Court Summarily Orders Dissolution of Deadlocked LLC GR US Licensing, LP v Seibel, Mem. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am
Does an operating agreement’s provision stating that “additional capital contribution may be made at such time and in such amounts as the Members shall determine” require unanimous consent of the LLC’s members, or does majority consent suffice? [read post]
