Search for: "State v. Two Bulls" Results 1 - 20 of 1,159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 11:07 am
In the wake of two recent fatal Pit Bull in New Mexico and a court rulings finding Pit Bulls inherently dangerous, the long-standing debate about breed-specific legislation and the inherent danger of Pitt Bulls continues in our state. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:46 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Frightening jurors and causing two female jurors to cry. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:49 am by Terry Hart
A Sirius Setback: Two Courts Reject Motion for Reconsideration was originally posted on Copyhype FootnotesNote, though, that Sirius XM had already done the same for the California federal court litigation prior to the New York decision.114 F.2d 86. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
 On 5 December 2011, Red Bull filed an application for a declaration of invalidity based on two earlier marks: 'VERLEIHT FLÜGEL' [gives wings], and 'RED BULL VERLEIHT FLÜÜÜGEL' registered for ‘energy drinks’ in class 32, in Austria.Red Bull successfully contested the mark- the Cancellation Division found that in light of the repute of their earlier mark, a link could be made in the mind of the public… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:32 am by Zachary Spilman
During the oral argument at CAAF on Monday 12 December in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm by Zachary Spilman
On Tuesday, January 24, CAAF will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]