Search for: "State v. V. A." Results 1 - 20 of 256,973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 2:14 am by traceydennis
Pankina v Secretary of State for the Home Dept;  Malekia v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Junaideen v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Sankar v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2010] EWCA Civ 719; [2010] WLR (D) 158  ”The immigration rules could not lawfully incorporate… [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 10:13 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Continue reading The post Timberlake v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF; Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE [2008] EWCA Civ 1148; [2008] WLR (D) 320 “The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the proper approach to the compatibility with the right to a fair trial in art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of hearings under s 3(10) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 to determine whether the Secretary of State for the… [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:41 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3); Same v AN; Same v AE House of Lords “Where, in the interests of national security, the Secretary of State for the Home Department wanted to rely on closed material in a terror-suspect hearing to justify his decision to make a control order, the controlled person [...] [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:19 pm by Staff
Not Guilty / Complete Acquittal State V. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm by Minick Law
Answer: Yes, according to the recent Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:11 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0553, 2010 MT 75, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:13 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3); Same v AN; Same v AE [2009] UKHL 28; [2009] WLR (D) 180 “Where, in the interests of national security, the Secretary of State relied on closed material in a hearing under s 3(10) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 to justify his decision [...] [read post]
5 May 2021, 6:05 am by Minick Law
On today’s episode take a deep dive with the NC DWI Guy into the facts within State v. [read post]