Search for: "State v. Vale" Results 21 - 40 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am by Joel R. Brandes
Jan. 31, 2019) (finding an award of fees and costs to be clearly inappropriate in part due to the petitioner’s pro bono representation); Vale v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Gustavo Arballo
 Las notas al pie son en su mayor parte referencias bibliográficas adicionales, pero algunas tienen ideas o conceptos que amplían los fundamentos y que vale la pena leer.Doe y Roe son apellidos que convencionalmente se utilizan como seudónimo de reemplazo cuando se busca preservar la identidad de las partes. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:03 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The cases in which permission has been granted are as follows: R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & Anor; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP & Anor Cheshire East Borough Council R (Cardiff & Vale University Board & Ors) v Ceredigion County Council & Ors Miller & Ors v Ministry of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of… [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareIf the justices’ comments during Wednesday’s argument in New York v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 8:36 am
However, he endorsed the approach of the Court of Appeal (in Welex AG v Rosa Maritime Limited (“The Epsilon Rosa”) [2003] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 509), in which it was made clear that those restrictions do not come into play when one is considering a permanent anti-suit injunction, and of the Commercial Court (in Vale Do Rio Doce Navegacao S.A and another v Shanghai Bao Steel Ocean Shipping Co Ltd and another [2000] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1), in which… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 am by Adrian Miedema
Resource Development Trades Council of Newfoundland and Labrador v Long Harbour Employers Association Inc, 2013 CanLII 88826 (NL LA)   [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]