Search for: "State v. Velez"
Results 21 - 40
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2008, 2:27 pm
Ct. at 837, quoting United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:05 am
2010AP1677 State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 6:18 am
In the case, Velez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:24 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Brown v Velez, 153 AD3d 517, the Appellate Division observed that at an administrative expungement hearing to determine whether a report of child abuse or maltreatment is substantiated, the allegations in the report must be established "by a preponderance of the evidence"*. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Brown v Velez, 153 AD3d 517, the Appellate Division observed that at an administrative expungement hearing to determine whether a report of child abuse or maltreatment is substantiated, the allegations in the report must be established "by a preponderance of the evidence"*. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
The appeals court looked to State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:22 am
The Court of Appeals holds that a jury must decide whether a woman who helped in the household was a family friend who could work without pay or a household worker who deserved a salary under the FLSA.The case is Velez v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
Velez 147 Misc. 2d 865 (Sup. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 5:52 am
Hawks, sentenced Specialist Velez to 26 years, reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, total forfeitures and a dishonorable discharge.Specialist Velez is currently confined at the Naval Brig Ford Island, Pearl Harbor, but will be remanded to the United States Army Corrections Command.The General Court Martial Convening Authority is Major General Bernard S. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 5:48 am
Jimerson & Frankie Velez, J.D. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
David was lead counsel representing approximately 7,000 female employees in Velez v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:10 am
But the Superior Court's decision is Velez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
In the case of U.S. v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:50 am
" The court did have one barrier to overcome in reaching this conclusion, Velez v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm
Velez (D. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:21 am
Presumably, in instances where a statute does not explicitly require an in-state location for an employer or employee, the administering agency (e.g., the Department of Labor or the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities) has greater leeway to interpret the law on that issue, particularly by adopting implementing regulations (see Velez v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in Beebe v Hartman, No. 142315, the Michigan Supreme Court vacated Part III B of the Court of Appeals’ opinion, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals’ concurring opinion. [read post]
