Search for: "State v. Vessel"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
-linked assets held outside the United States that would clear through the U.S. financial system. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[43] Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) E. coli O157:H7 infections can lead to a severe, life-threatening complication called hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS).[44] HUS accounts for the majority of the acute deaths and chronic injuries caused by the… [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Performs an Emergency Service or Function The entity provides one or more of the following emergency services or functions to a population equal to or greater than 50,000 individuals: (i) Law enforcement; (ii) Fire and rescue services; (iii) Emergency medical services; (iv) Emergency management; or (v) Public works that contribute to public health and safety. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:58 pm
In Tube-Mac Indus. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Conti chartered its cargo vessel, the M/V FLAMINIA, to the Mediterranean Shipping Company (“MSC”). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:38 pm
This was argued in R v Masich, in which it was stated that accused was invited into a residence, instead of breaking into it. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am
”[11] In 1813, the American vessel, Marquis de Somerueles, was carrying cargo from the Italian Academy of Arts when it was captured by the British.[12] The United States successfully petitioned the Admiralty Court of Halifax to have the cargo be returned to the United States.[13] The Court held that the arts and sciences are entitled to protection as “an exception to the severe rights of warfare. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 2:44 am
MUR did not accept RTI’s proposal, stating that the contract required payment in US dollars, that there had been a force majeure event and consequently suspended vessel nomination under the contract on the basis of the force majeure clause. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:49 am
§ 30501, et seq. [2] Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 1:43 pm
Such was the case in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:42 pm
Red Cross v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am
In Hotchkiss v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:54 am
G’s employment contract stated that her normal place of work would be on the vessel on voyages worldwide, or wherever required by YMC Ltd for the proper performance of her duties. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Third, Congress explicitly recognized that, by definition, support for the construction of foreign vessels used in international trade burdens or restricts U.S. commerce and thus is a proper target for action under Section 301. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Third, Congress explicitly recognized that, by definition, support for the construction of foreign vessels used in international trade burdens or restricts U.S. commerce and thus is a proper target for action under Section 301. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 10:40 am
SE v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 am
The Florida Supreme Court ruled in the 1994 case of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 am
The Florida Supreme Court ruled in the 1994 case of U.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am
The shipowners issued bills of lading which were stated to incorporate the terms of the voyage charterparty. [read post]
