Search for: "State v. Vick"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
Cir. 2000); Richardson-Vicks, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:26 am
" Richardson-Vicks Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:14 pm
The situation presented here parallels that presented in Richardson-Vicks Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 1:50 am
Raymond v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:50 am
Va. 2009) and Vitatoe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm
Five years later, in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
The leading case on this route an appraisal is Vick v Albert, 47 AD3d 482 (1st Dept 2008). [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm
Eisai, 533 F.3d at 1356 (citing Richardson-Vicks Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Couvillion, Note, Defending for its life: ChampionsWorld LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
But also because I was jarred by the juxtaposition of his dissent in Johnson with his decision to join the 8-1 majority in yesterday's ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
While Partnership Law §73 permits continuation of the partnership accompanied by a buyout of a deceased member's interest under certain, narrowly-defined circumstances (e.g., see my previous piece on the Vick v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
In other words, in the infinite, almost unanimous wisdom of the Georgia Senate, Michael Vick is being imprisoned illegally, Bernie Madoff should serve no time for stealing $60 billion and the Unabomber must go free. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:10 pm
In light of Tuesday’s Supreme Court ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
In the United States, where dog fighting was the subject of much media attention in the past few years following football player Michael Vick’s conviction, all fifty states have laws prohibiting dog fighting. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Referee Crespo also bases his rejection of DLOM on case law, including Vick v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
