Search for: "State v. WINGROVE"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2008, 8:39 am
This short film was banned at the time of its 1980s release and is the subject of a well-known European Court of Human Rights decision, Wingrove v UK, which Wingrove lost, with the UK benefitting from a wide ‘margin of appreciation’ in its regulation of certain kinds of offensive speech; the influential elements include the finding that “whereas there is little scope under Article 10 para. 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political… [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 10:16 am
Wingrove v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm
The decision handed down last week by the United States Supreme Court in United States v Stevens shows the radically different approach taken in the United States in relation questions of “extreme” and “offensive” freedom of expression. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
Austria, 13470/87, 20 September 1994; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 17419/90, 25 November 1996; İ.A. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am
The Court first reiterated that Article 10 protects ‘expressive conduct’, including expressive conduct which offends, shocks or disturbs the State or ‘any section of the population’. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
The clarifying test of the matter, as laid out in Wingrove v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
Wingrove (1879) ILR 4 Cal 137 and Ram Prasad And Ors. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
In Colgrove v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:33 pm
Austria, Wingrove v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:45 am
“The clarifying test of the matter, as laid out in Wingrove v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm
Furthermore, in Handyside v United Kingdom Strasbourg accepted that freedom of speech applies to views which shock and offend and which are heartily disapproved of by the recipient [49]. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
