Search for: "State v. Wales" Results 21 - 40 of 1,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2015, 4:57 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
However, distinguishing the present case from the leading case of Osman v UK (1998) 29 EHRR 245, Lord Justice Longmore held that the claim for a breach of the ECHR, art 2 should go to trial. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
Here's a little curio, courtesy of the LexisNexis Butterworths Update service: it's Pocket Kings Ltd v Safenames Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 2529 (Ch), a 16 October 2009 decision of Michael Furness QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Mr Kennedy’s claim form was issued in England & Wales on 24 February 2017, just prior to the one year defamation limitation period in England & Wales. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
In OW and OV v Members of the Board of the Wesley Mission Council, (NSWADT, Dec. 10, 2010), the Administrative Decisions Tribunal of the Australian state of New South Wales held that the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Act does not require a religiously-sponsored social service organization to approve same-sex couples as foster care providers. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
On 28 November 2011 the New South Wales Court of Appeal determined that defamatory statements uttered by police doing their work are protected by both forms of qualified privilege – statutory and common law ([2011] NSWCA 370). [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
The only particulars of publication were to three individuals, two in the state of Victoria and one in New South Wales. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:27 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AP v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 731 (15 July 2009) Patchett & Amor v Swimming Pool & Allied Trades Association Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 717 (15 July 2009) Coke-Wallis v Institute of Chartered Accountants In England and Wales [2009] EWCA Civ 730 (15 July 2009) High Court (Administrative [...] [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm by INFORRM
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 6:21 am
In Copyright Agency Limited v State of New South Wales [2008] HCA 35, the High Court decided that the State of New South Wales was not entitled to use surveyors' plans (by copying the survey plans and providing them to the public) without fairly remunerating copyright owners. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Forum non conveniens The Claimant relied on EU case law (Owusu v Jackson (C-281/2002) and Maletic v lastminute.com GmbH (C-478-12)) to argue that the court was precluded from considering forum non conveniens issues. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 2:38 am by INFORRM
The case of Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing ([2016] EWHC 66 (QB)) was a defamation claim in respect of an article in a Portuguese newspaper which alleged illegality on the part of a banker. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The IPKat has had his attention directed to the decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd, [2011] EWCA Civ 382, a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morrit, The Chancellor of the High Court, providing a judgment with which Richards and Patten LJJ agreed) handed down yesterday.To summarise: Teva had applied for revocation of Merck’s European Patent (EP(UK) 0509752), relating to “ophthalmic compositions comprising combinations of… [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 10:18 am by Dan Antoun
On 12 July 2016 the Supreme Court heard the appeal of Moreno v The Motor Insurers’ Bureau. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
A recent judgment by the High Court of England and Wales in the case of Jamp Pharma Corp v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
A recent judgment by the High Court of England and Wales in the case of Jamp Pharma Corp v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
A recent judgment by the High Court of England and Wales in the case of Jamp Pharma Corp v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
A recent judgment by the High Court of England and Wales in the case of Jamp Pharma Corp v. [read post]