Search for: "State v. Wales"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 11:15 am
"'Pattern of Discrimination': The United States, Refugees and Barriers to Asylum," University of New South Wales Law Journal Student Series, no. 8 (2020) [full-text]Policies Affecting Asylum Seekers at the Border: The Migrant Protection Protocols, Prompt Asylum Claim Review, Humanitarian Asylum Review Process, Metering, Asylum Transit Ban, and How They Interact (American Immigration Council, Jan. 2020) [text]Use of Video in Place of In-Person Immigration… [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:22 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lord Justice Mummery, Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Jacob) has given its ruling today in Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV, Information Management Consultancy Limited (t/a Responsive Designs and/or Tapis UK) and B&Q plc [2007] EWCA Civ 364. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:48 am
England is trying to catch up with Ohio and the rest of the United States when it comes to Family Law. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:39 pm
Deeds not words: Let's have some action on prisoners voting rightsRobert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what plans he has to extend voting rights to sentenced prisoners in England and Wales. [218573]Bridget Prentice: Following the European Court of Human Rights' judgment in the case of Hirst v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:37 pm
The Judge also held that while each US state is technically a separate jurisdiction, it would ‘defy common sense to hold that the State of California would not accept jurisdiction for all publications in the US’. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:49 pm
Safe Work New South Wales v Austral Hydroponics P/L; Safe Work New South Wales v Eang Lam [2015] NSWDC 295 Safe Work NSW has brought a successful prosecution against a Company Austral Hydroponics Pty Ltd (Austral Hydroponics) and its Director Mr Eang Lam (Mr Lam). [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:11 pm
The Magistrate cited United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:11 am
(“Google”) to appeal the England and Wales Court of Appeal’s decision in Google Inc. v Vidal-Hall and Others. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
But a claimant in a defamation or malicious falsehood claim who obtained permission to serve out of the jurisdiction had to limit the claim to alleged publications within England and Wales – a principle re-stated by the House of Lords in Berezovsky v Forbes Inc (No.1) ([2000] 1 WLR 1004) Mr Huda’s only potentially viable cause of action was the publication of the report to the GOC -he had no real prospect of establishing publication to… [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:47 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) JSC BTA Bank v Granton Trade Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 564 (01 May 2012) AA (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer – Addis Ababa [2012] EWCA Civ 563 (01 May 2012) Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 (01 May 2012) Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor v Minkin [2012] EWCA Civ 546 (01 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Rai & Ors v The Charity Commission for England… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:51 am
Thanks to the IPKat for pointing out Knorr-Bremse Systems for Commercial Vehicles Ltd v Haldex Brake Products GmbH [2008] EWHC 156 (Pat), a ruling of England and Wales Patents Court where judge Mr Justice Lewison stated that "There is at the least a good arguable case that, even if KBS UK are bound by the non-challenge [to patent validity] clause (which in my judgment they are not) that clause is void because it contravenes article 81 EC:". . . 48. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
The two key cases are Province of Bombay v Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay [1947] AC 58 and Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council [1990] 2 AC 580. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:23 am
Supreme Court Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 Plc v Walker & Anor [2010] UKSC 32 (07 July 2010) HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31 (07 July 2010) Court of Appeal Gale & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2010] EWCA Civ 759 (07 July 2010) Mentmore International Ltd & Ors v Abbey Healthcare (Festival) Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 761 (07 July 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Goldfarb v… [read post]
