Search for: "State v. Wales"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
The Law Commission today launched an extended consultation paper on reform of divorce law in England and Wales; specifically the allocation of matrimonial property. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:16 am
Kaori Minami is a Japanese-qualified lawyer who is also qualified in England & Wales. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:20 am
In Bevege v Hizb ut-Tahrir Australia, (NSW Civ & Adm Trib, March 4, 2016), the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of the Australian state of New South Wales held that sex-segregated seating at a lecture sponsored by a Muslim group violates the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Act of 1977. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
The Prosecutor v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 10:22 pm
In Sanum v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:04 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Jones v Kaney [2010] EWHC 61 (QB) (21 January 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Mhango, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1321 (Admin) (10 June 2010) Am, R (on the application of) v The Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [2010] EWHC 1228 (Admin) (28 May 2010) The Law Society of England and Wales, R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor… [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am
Where a defendant in a libel claim is not domiciled in the United Kingdom, another Member State or a state which is a contracting party to the Lugano Convention, claimants have a very difficult task in obtaining evidence to satisfy the Court that of all the places in which the statements complained of have been published England and Wales is clearly the most appropriate jurisdiction to bring the claim. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:56 am
' was the question before the court in Shanks v Unilever plc and others [2009] EWHC 3164 (Ch), a decision of Mr Justice Mann in the Patents Court, England and Wales, yesterday. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:32 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jeleniewicz v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1163 (23 October 2008) James v Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1158 (23 October 2008) Harding v Revenue & Customs [2008] EWCA Civ 1164 (23 October 2008) Parris v Williams [2008] EWCA Civ 1147 (23 October 2008) Ashwell Property Group Plc & Anor v Cambridge City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1151 (22 October 2008) High… [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
This chapter explores this general development through detailed consideration of the particular case of Pierce v State (1843) 13 NH 536. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 11:50 pm
Following a series of cases in which the High Court of England and Wales has granted blocking orders, a new injunction has been issued against two websites called SolarMovie and TubePlus. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:44 pm
The paper was given at the NSW State Legal Conference on Thursday 28 August 2014. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
There are 94 for men, distributed around England and Wales, including several in London. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 3:18 pm
In that previous post, I noted that Cole v Whitfield untangled the complex thickets of jurisprudence that had grown up around Australia’s equivalent to Part XIII of the Indian Constitution – and, in doing so, reversed some of the Australian constitutional notions (such as those arising from New South Wales v Commonwealth (1948), “the Bank Nationalisation case”) that had been cited and applied by the Indian Supreme Court in Atiabari Tea Co v… [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:11 am
In that previous post, I noted that Cole v Whitfield untangled the complex thickets of jurisprudence that had grown up around Australia’s equivalent to Part XIII of the Indian Constitution – and, in doing so, reversed some of the Australian constitutional notions (such as those arising from New South Wales v Commonwealth (1948), “the Bank Nationalisation case”) that had been cited and applied by the Indian Supreme Court in Atiabari Tea Co v… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
Justice Arnold stated that Defendants were service providers within the meaning of the 1988 Act as this question had already been settled in Dramatico v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Health Science Distributors Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:05 am
In Naeem v The Secretary of State for Justice, (EWCA, Dec. 9, 2015) , the England and Wales Court of Appeal held that discrimination was not the cause of the average pay of Muslim prison chaplains in British prisons being lower on average than that of Christian chaplains. [read post]
