Search for: "State v. Waterhouse" Results 61 - 80 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2018, 8:26 am by Aurora Barnes
§ 2000e-2(a)(1), meant “gender identity” and included “transgender status” when Congress enacted Title VII in 1964; and (2) whether Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
The Smiths and Judge Moore were certainly trailblazers, paving the way for legal precedent supporting the LGBTQ+ community for years to follow.The full text of the decision can be found here: Smith v Avanti. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by admin
It is worth noting, however, that the high court previously ruled that gender discrimination based on gender stereotypes is unlawful (Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:00 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
In its decision, the EEOC substantially relied upon the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:18 pm
” In so holding, the EEOC relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:28 pm
Waterhouse, and headed "Reversal stuns abuse caseworkers. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:00 pm
Price Waterhouse, 252 AD2d 179, 202 [1st Dept 1998]). [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:16 am by Joy Waltemath
While opponents of the traditional approach to Title VII argue that their position is compelled by the Supreme Court’s Price Waterhouse v. [read post]