Search for: "State v. Waver"
Results 1 - 20
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2022, 9:15 am
When NC filed its opening brief in the independent state legislature case, Moore v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 2:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:21 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:19 pm
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could “recoup” over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with respect to such reemployments… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could "recoup" over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with respect to such… [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 9:28 pm
FINRA contends that Hutson willfully violated its Article V, Section 2 (C) by-laws by not disclosing the criminal charge. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
The Court has wavered as to whether agency interpretations of criminal statutes should be entitled to deference. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:39 am
Koch v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:02 pm
, United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 2:47 pm
In Grau v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:55 pm
Still ever wavering on the EU issue (this week I’m for leaving again) I watched Al Murray’s pub landlord neatly summing up the EU crisis in this sublime, laugh out loud clip. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm
by Dennis Crouch United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:56 pm
State Power First and foremost, states currently retain power to decide who stays home and for how long. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 7:58 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
Then, quoting Standard Oil v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:12 pm
Fifty years before, Pete Hernandez v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:00 am
(I’m wavering only because the Order also sets aside the CEQA documentation for all of the Scoping Plan, seemingly without caveat — still pondering that wrinkle, thoughts welcome.) [read post]
