Search for: "State v. Weisberg" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2021, 12:13 pm
"  True that, I guess.)The Court of Appeal not only affirms, but also drops a footnote:  "We assume the trial court and attorney Weisberg have already reported the judicially imposed sanctions to the State Bar of California. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 10:02 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Jeannie Suk (Harvard University - Harvard Law School) has posted 'The Look in His Eyes': The Story of State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
Here is the abstract.This chapter for Criminal Law Stories (Robert Weisberg & Donna Coker eds., 2010), tells the story of State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
  As the indictment noted:"The 'Compensation of Directors' section of the 2003 Form 10-K state, in substance and in part, that Xybernaut's directors, including WEISBERG, were paid $1,000 per board meeting and received options to purchase 10,000 Xybernaut shares annually. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by David Markus
Congrats to Judge Wilson for being recognized by the Green Bag for exemplary legal writing for his dissent in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
Today is the deadline for amicus briefs in support of the respondent state in Giles v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
Previously both Jennifer Millner Weisberg and I blogged on a highly publicized New Jersey family law case, Fawzy v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Juvan Bonni
Freistein: The PTAB Is Not an Article III Court, Part 2: Aqua Products v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:01 am by Hillary A. Frommer
 In Estate of Weisberg, decided on April 8, 2014, the court addressed the issue of marriage. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:51 am by Zoe Tillman
Second, they argued that prosecutors withheld potentially exculpatory evidence in violation of the precedent set in Brady v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An accountant’s engagement letter governs the parameters of their retention (Italia Imports v Weisberg & Lesk, 220 AD2d 226, 226-227 [1st Dept 1995]). [read post]