Search for: "State v. Weissman" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, the motion court properly dismissed the complaint (see Weissman v Kessler, 78 AD3d 465 [2010]; Katebi v Fink, 51 AD3d 424 [2008]). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by George M. Wallace
Doudna states in his supporting affidavit that he did not write, post, or even read that report at the time. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:06 pm
Weissman argued that for nearly a century, judges, prosecutors and defense lawyers had misconstrued a 1909 Supreme Court decision, called New York Central and Hudson River Railroad v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm by Deepak Gupta
  Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in Rent-a-Center v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:21 am by Erin Miller
United States, in which the Court recently granted cert. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Id. at 425) Similarly, in dismissing another plaintiff's legal malpractice case, the Court in Weissman v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:44 am by Just Security
by Joana de Andrade Pacheco (@_JoanaPacheco) United Nations – Srebrenica Genocide Critical UN Move: Draft Resolution Confronts Genocide Denial in the Balkans by Leon Hartwell (@LeonHartwell) and Hikmet Karčić (@hikmet_karcic) Podcast: Presidential Immunity The Just Security Podcast: United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
United States ex. rel. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:48 am by Erin Miller
Jordan Weissman at the BLT reports that in yesterday’s oral argument in Robertson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am by Adam Chandler
Reporting and commentary on the import of last month’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]