Search for: "State v. Westgate"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2020, 12:36 pm
Westgate Resorts, Ltd. v. [read post]
RESISTING ARREST/TRESPASSING/DISORDERLY CONDUCT CONVICTION EXPUNGED – State v. Ms. H. (DMC No. 9104)
17 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
RESISTING ARREST/TRESPASSING/DISORDERLY CONDUCT CONVICTION EXPUNGED – State v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:05 am
In Westgate Tabernacle, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:05 am
In Westgate Tabernacle v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:05 am
In Westgate Tabernacle v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 10:22 am
Westgate Resorts, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
Hodges v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
Hodges v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 3:08 am
Hodges v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:55 am
Today the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Bond v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Pittman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:37 am
Marchitelli v 15 Westgate Terrace Ltd (2020) UKUT 192 (LC) An Upper Tribunal appeal of an FTT decision that the leaseholder, Ms M, was in breach of lease, and specifically a restriction “Not to do or permit or suffer in or upon the Demised Premises or any part thereof any illegal or immoral act or any act or thing which may be or may become a nuisance or annoyance or cause damage to the Lessors or the tenants of the Lessor or the occupiers of any part of the Building. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
Westgate, 101 Mass. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am
Mr Westgate gave the example of a person who, by application of the Hotak comparison, is found to be likely to become seriously ill, as a direct result of being made homeless. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
I would agree with Mr Westgate that, since the creation of a statutory right of appeal to the county court, recourse to the highly restrictive approach adopted 30 years ago in the Puhlhofer case (R v Hillingdon London Borough Council, Ex p Puhlhofer [1986] AC 484) is no longer necessary or appropriate. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm
Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2019) EWHC 452 (Admin) (For transparency, I acted for one of the interveners, the Residential Landlords Association, in this case.) [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:47 am
" David Ryan shed light on the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in the United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:32 am
In Westgate Village Shopping Center v. [read post]
