Search for: "State v. Whitfield" Results 41 - 60 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2015, 2:00 pm by Staci Zaretsky
[NPR] * Speaking of Justice Scalia, the Supreme jurist managed to sneak in a citation to Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice in his opinion in Whitfield v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:00 am by VALL Blog Master
Bridgeman, associate general counsel, Freddie MacDeborah V. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Whitfield-Ortiz v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 116 AD3d 580, 581 [1st Dept 2014]; Askin v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 110 AD3d 621, 622 [1st Dept 2013]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Whitfield-Ortiz v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 116 AD3d 580, 581 [1st Dept 2014]; Askin v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 110 AD3d 621, 622 [1st Dept 2013]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm by WIMS
"     UCS said that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am by John Elwood
”  Whitfield joins Bond v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
The saga of State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
” Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Whitfield v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:29 pm by Woodrow Pollack
 So that's how it ends up.Pursuant to the California divorce decree, Whitfield retained no property rights in the patents, so Enovsys had standing to bring and maintain this suit.Enovsys v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 6:28 am
Co. v Whitfield,AD3d, 2009 NY Slip Op 02975 [2d Dept 2009]; Singh v Allcity Ins. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]