Search for: "State v. Whitfield"
Results 41 - 60
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2014, 7:01 am
The United States Supreme Court heard arguments in the case yesterday. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Whitfield v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:00 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Whitfield v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:34 pm
“It’s a very bad statute,” complained Justice Antonin Scalia toward the end of today’s oral argument in Whitfield v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm
The transcript in Whitfield v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:35 am
United States and last Term’s Bond v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:09 pm
Shabani, 513 U.S. 10 (1994) and Whitfield v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am
June — same issue as in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
Expectation of privacy underlies decisions in such cases as United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Meanwhile, an IFP petition, two-time relist Whitfield v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:55 am
Now, the third office, Federal Defenders of Western North Carolina, is in on the game, getting certiorari granted in Whitfield v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:35 am
Waxman Statement on Supreme Court's Decision in UARG v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:38 am
In the others, the Court is to decide what proof that federal prosecutors must offer to get a longer sentence when an alleged robber draws someone else into the crime, resulting in injury or death (Whitfield v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:28 am
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which links to papers: Whitfield v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
We have just a single returning relist: Whitfield v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
” Whitfield joins Bond v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:00 am
Bridgeman, associate general counsel, Freddie MacDeborah V. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am
On November 25, 2013, the jury in TQP Development, LLC v. 1-800-Flowers.com, et al., U.S.D.C., E.D. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:54 am
State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 7:17 am
LEXIS 122503, July 30, 2012) and dismissed a claim by a civilly committed atheist that forcing him to participate in various specific sex offender treatment programs violates his free exercise rights and the Establishment Clause.In Whitfield v. [read post]
