Search for: "State v. Whittle Communications" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 11:32 pm
Second, the identification of a minority group or community requires a determination of whether the discrete group is numerically less than 50% of the total population of a state (Bal Patil v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 10:40 am by Venkat
Goas filed an amended complaint, alleging claims under the Stored Communications Act and variety of state law claims. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:51 am by Eric Goldman
Still, the case got whittled down so that the only active claim was a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:30 am by Venkat
State law claims: Yunker’s state law claims also suffer from a variety of deficiencies. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:44 pm by Venkat
Other State Law Claims: Plaintiffs asserted a slew of other state law claims, the bulk of which fell by the wayside. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:27 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The lawsuit was previously whittled down; this time around, the court gets rid of the Lanham Act claim, but sends the Stored Communications Act claim to trial. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
No. 3122052) filed on February 24, 2005 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and stated to have been first used in commerce at least as early as February 4, 2004 (the "FACEBOOK Marks"), and a European Community Trademark for FACEBOOK (Reg. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
[W]hile using the James Van Praagh Trademark, he has appeared on syndicated television shows; presented at large conferences and retreats; worked with people throughout the United States and internationally; authored books; maintained a website and online community; and offered seminars. . . . [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
The power of a Community collective mark, when contrasted with a protected geographical indication, was put to the test on 2 October, in Cases T-624/13 (noted here), T-625/13, 626/13 and 627/13 The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Delta Lingerie Intervening, when the Eighth Chamber of the General Court of the European Union gave its decision on a series of separate Community trade mark oppositions relating to… [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:46 pm
    Files: 53_-_order_on_motion_to_dismiss.pdfRelated Issues: Section 230 of the Communications Decency ActRelated Cases: Internet Archive v. [read post]