Search for: "State v. Wiley" Results 361 - 380 of 584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am by Bruce E. Boyden
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
  That’s the issue tackled by the 2nd District in State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
This fall term, the United States Supreme Court will hear Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
John Wiley & Son – a case  involving gray market goods and copyright items;  Clapper v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
Hoboken, N.J. : John Wiley, 2011 xiv, 257 p. : ill., forms ; 23 cm. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:53 am by admin
District Court for the Northern District of California (United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
#startups nyc london…http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2291836513200414722012-07-28 11:42:20 HarvardLaw74: Krista Cox 8 case citation amicus brief in Wiley First Sale case #copyright…quite good [Can a book publisher sell a book at 50 percent off overseas and prevent its import back the United States for a second sale? [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. — right to bring into the U.S. for resale a copyrighted item purchased abroad Tues., Oct. 30: 11-820 — Chaidez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm by admin
The brief comes as a response to a recent decision by the Second Circuit to limit the protections under Section 109 of the Copyright Act to works created within the United States in John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm by admin
On July 3, the Library Copyright Alliance filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court as a result of their decision to review the Second Circuit’s decision in John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm by admin
On July 3, the Library Copyright Alliance filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court as a result of their decision to review the Second Circuit’s decision in John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]