Search for: "State v. Willers" Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Willers v Joyce & Anor (in substitution for and in their capacity as executors of Albert Gubay (deceased)), heard 7 March 2016. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Willers v Joyce & Anor (in substitution for and in their capacity as executors of Albert Gubay (deceased)), heard 7 March 2016. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Willers v Joyce & Anor (in substitution for and in their capacity as executors of Albert Gubay (deceased)), heard 7 March 2016. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:03 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Willers v Joyce & Anor (in substitution for and in their capacity as executors of Albert Gubay (deceased)), heard 7 March 2016. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 12 November, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Nugent & Anor v Willers (Isle of Man). [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day judgment was handed down in the case of R (on the application of Jefferies & Ors) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin). [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
25 May 2021, 12:12 pm by Giles Peaker
Tal (1985) QB 67, 81; Willers v Joyce [2016] UKSC 44 § 9: “puisne judges are not technically bound by decisions of their peers, but they should generally follow a decision of a court of co-ordinate jurisdiction unless there is a powerful reason for not doing so. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The University of Strathclyde has commented on this issues stating that “Digital surveillance holds one in five of writers back”. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]