Search for: "State v. Willis" Results 621 - 640 of 830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
He last appeared before the Supreme Court in November 2002, six months before the Senate confirmed his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc ( (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm by B.W. Barnett
  As I'm getting settled back into my blogging routine, here are a couple of cases from July that you might find helpful or informative (or perhaps neither). 11 Angry Men In Willis v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:38 am by SHG
  No dice, said the Fourth Circuit in Ostregren v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
-Conn (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): All threats, no action…: Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL (IPKat)   United States  US General California’s Trade Secret disclosure statute doesn’t apply in Federal Court – or maybe it does (IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO wants to change restriction practice (Patent Baristas) The post-Bilski landscape: Why some tried, but failed, to ban ‘business method’ patents (Prior… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:53 pm by Ray Dowd
It appears as if artworks that once belonged to the art dealer and publisher Alfred Flechtheim are hanging in dozens of institutions such as the Ludwig Museum in Cologne, the Bavarian State Collection of Paintings in Munich, the State-Gallery Stuttgart or the Berlin State Museums. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm by Kurt Schulzke
” Kent Willis, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union for Virginia, warned that if the institution were to “roll over”, it “could chill university-based scientific inquiry”. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm by INFORRM
  It is arguable that Article 10 places the state under a positive obligation to provide such access. [read post]