Search for: "State v. Wines"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 pm
The KSC dismissed as improvidently granted a state's petition for review preserving Mark Schoenhofer's win in State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 4:02 pm
Granholm v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
In the recent case of Joel Gott Wines, LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:37 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of FloridaOpinion Date: 1/14/11Cite: Southern Wine and Spirits of America, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 6:17 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
”); and Rotkiske v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 1:32 pm
While local business and political leaders are hoping the relaxed regulations will encourage further investment in the state’s wine industry, producers, retailers, and wine lovers alike are cheering the increased access to locally-grown wines ahead of the summer tourism season. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 2:39 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:32 am
Sam’s Wines & Liquors, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 5:08 pm
[ILB - Crawford v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:09 pm
In Eith v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:15 pm
The decision is that of the 7th Circuit yesterday in the case of Baude v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:55 am
Lagunitas does so to express their dismay and confusion about the current state of world affairs. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
Almeida v Arruda, 89 Mass App Ct 241, 241-48 (MA App. 3/18/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses, Uncategorized [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
at 15 (quoting McCarthy v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:32 am
Castro v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
The issues are similar to those in Ritz Hotel Ltd v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:20 pm
It doesn't bode well for you when the very first paragraph of the Court of Appeal's factual statement includes the following two sentences: "[Plaintiff] has filed in excess of 400 such actions in state and federal court, and has been declared a vexatious litigant in both jurisdictions. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:28 am
The examiner said "no", citing Article 7(1)(j) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation which states that ‘The following shall not be registered: … (j) trade marks for wines which contain or consist of a geographical indication identifying wines … with respect to such wines … not having that origin. [read post]
