Search for: "State v. Winfrey"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2015, 8:16 pm
App. 2003); Gorman v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
| Oprah Winfrey and OWN YOUR POWER trade mark | EPO December Administrative Council Meeting | Blurred Lines | Again on Actavis v Boehringer | Is the EU Patent Package diminishing the EU’s powers? [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
A call for sanity‘Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
This case is Kelly-Brown v Winfrey, No. 11 cv 7875 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
’s care and stated that she did not have the financial resources to continue that care without James’s help. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:10 pm
Winfrey (E.D. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 3:31 pm
Moreover, in Winfrey, this Court expressed the opinion that the holding in People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:59 pm
The case of People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 10:00 pm
BPI v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 10:08 pm
Certainly it’s no State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:00 pm
Harada (easement) Premises liability – Winfrey v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
Landis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 11:23 pm
Would Diane Sawyer hanging around tiny Elk Point, SD for a state Circuit Court trial be even more of a spectacle than in 1998 when Oprah Winfrey had to spent most of a week in the Texas cattle city of Amarillo? [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
More information about the case can be found under the name Beef Products Inc et al v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:00 am
James V. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
In November, the state’s highest criminal court agreed to review the case of Megan Winfrey, who is serving a life sentence for murder. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
” Argument recap: The constitutionality of zombie copyrights — Rebecca Tushnet provides some thoughts on last week’s oral arguments in Golan v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:13 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]