Search for: "State v. Winkelmann" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am by David Canton
Watson, Winkelmann’s legal counsel, stated “the sense of parody employed by Winkelmann within the context of his South Butt undertakings clearly demonstrate a respectful, if not faltering ‘anti-North Face’ posture designed in all respects to distinguish itself from any and all North Face products. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by suffolkmcls
They filed suit in mid-December alleging a variety of federal and state trademark violations including infringement, dilution by blurring, dilution by tarnishment, and false designation of origin. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:25 am by Jeralyn
The case is [2012] NZHC 2076 - The United States of America v Dotcom & Ors. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:08 am
 The Fourth Circuit's decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:32 am
” for vehicles, ruling on summary judgment that Winkelmann had failed to establish the requisite bona fide intent to use his mark in the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 3:34 am
“Subrogation is the principle by which an insurer, having paid losses of its insured, is placed in the position of its insured so that it may recover from the third party legally responsible for the loss" (Winkelmann v Excelsior Ins. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am by Patrick McDonnell
Following a stay and abeyance pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Hamdan v. [read post]