Search for: "State v. Woodfall"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2013, 9:09 am
” (at [7]).The Learned Lord Justice does not appear to have been addressed at all (let alone at any length) on why that is wrong, but has stated it as law nonetheless. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:09 am
” (at [7]).The Learned Lord Justice does not appear to have been addressed at all (let alone at any length) on why that is wrong, but has stated it as law nonetheless. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:08 am
In particular a reference is made to the case of Artworld v Safaryan (which we dealt with here). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:22 am
I take to twitter There are several L&T barristers on twitter - @cjr1968 (Catherine Rowlands) referred me to the case of London and Westminster Loan Co. v London and Northern Western Railway [1893] going on to say “Don’t think there’s a case that specifically states the rule but it is right. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
As stated in Woodfall at paragraph 17.181, “In the eyes of equity, the proviso for re-entry was merely a “security” for the rent. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:41 pm
” The Court of Appeal referred to Prudential Assurance Co. ltd. v London Residuary Body & ors. [read post]
3 May 2020, 10:48 am
” Woodfall at 13.36 states “All structures are constructed out of materials which were originally chattels, such as the bricks used to build a wall. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:40 pm
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga (2020) EWHC 1353 (QB) Flexible tenancies. [read post]
