Search for: "State v. Yildirim" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Najera & Dorit Rubinstein Reiss, First Do No Harm: Protecting Patients Through Immunizing Health Care Workers, (February 8, 2015).Seval Yildirim, Conceptions of Religion in the Secular State: Evolving Turkish Secularism, (Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 1049, 2014).William P. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Adell, Razing the Forest to Kill a Tree: EEOC V. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm by INFORRM
One of these measures is the blocking in the EU of the Russian state media RT (Russia Today) and Sputnik (link). [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
It provides that each state party will “respect and ensure” ICCPR rights to individuals within its territory and jurisdiction, without distinction. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am by Jordan Brunner
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by Cyberleagle
It is open to question whether compliance with the legality principle can be achieved simply by inserting ‘proportionate’ into a broadly stated legal duty, instead of grasping the nettle of articulating a more concrete obligation that would enable the proportionality of the interference with fundamental rights to be assessed by a court. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:13 am
However, the ECtHR (Bevacqua and S v Bulgaria and Opuz v Turkey) and the CEDAW Committee (Yildirim v Austria; Goekce v Austria) have recognised that the right to privacy is also a positive obligation to secure the private realm so that individuals may flourish. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Privacy Regulations and Online Search Friction: Evidence from GDPR, Yu Zhao, Pinar Yildirim and Pradeep K. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
  United States On 13 June 2023, the Texas Governor signed HB4 to make Texas the tenth state to have a comprehensive privacy law. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
It’s in the caselaw of the Court of Human Rights, and it’s summarised  in the Yildirim v Turkey  ruling. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]