Search for: "State v. a Quantity of Copies of Books"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2017, 8:06 am
See 3869130 Canada Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
I have no trouble with articles or individual chapters of my book being copied for use in the classroom. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
I have no trouble with articles or individual chapters of my book being copied for use in the classroom. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
I have no trouble with articles or individual chapters of my book being copied for use in the classroom. [read post]
Court Benchslaps Trade Secret Plaintiff and Counsel For Bad Faith Litigation–RBC Bearings v. Caliber
18 Aug 2016, 7:41 am
The opinion isn’t in Westlaw but does appear in Lexis [RBC Bearings Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
A likely third-party hack of Marsh’s personal server resulted in portions of the confidential data being posted on the Internet with offers to sell larger quantities. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
He continued to claim that he was arguing with his girlfriend before he saw the officers, and stated that she was also the person he had called from the booking area. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:38 am
And it’s not just the quantity, but the quality that has failed us. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
Div. 2007) State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:19 am
United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:26 am
” In other words, users have to think about not just the quantity they’re copying, but also the significance of the content. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
Three academic publishers filed suit against Georgia State University claiming that the University infringed their copyrights by maintaining a policy which allows GSU professors to make digital copies of excerpts of their books available to students without paying them a royalty. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
The dispute concerned alleged copying and misuse of confidential information. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:30 am
HathiTrust involved claims of fair use for digital book-scanning, where the purpose of whole-book scanning was to facilitate (re)search and not to function as a market substitute for copies of the scanned works. [read post]
In Java case, Federal Circuit just declined to hold massive body of creative stuff non-copyrightable
10 May 2014, 12:23 am
Yes, this is a real case of copying, unlike Apple v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:09 am
The theory of Smith [v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:16 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Perhaps the objectives of Dumb Starbucks and Starbucks do not seem “sharply different” in this context (Blanch v Koons).Could Dumb Starbucks have pursued their marketing objective without copying as much of the Starbucks branding? [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
A week earlier the New Mexico Supreme Court decided Sunnyland Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
