Search for: "State v. a Quantity of Copies of Books"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm
Elias took the photographs at issue, Elias LLC would extend broad licenses to the Hotels, allowing them to use the photographs to promote their properties in unlimited quantities, for an unlimited time, and in any format – without a restriction on how the photographs’ CMI could be manipulated or removed.5 The Hotels were licensed to use the photographs at issue to market their properties on their own websites and on third-party travel booking websites or OTAs. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
Posner wrote: [The user’s] bypassing Flava’s pay wall by viewing the uploaded copy is equivalent to stealing a copyrighted book from a bookstore and reading it. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Having read many posts by Falkvinge (as well as many law books), I don’t get the impression that he’s actually opened many law books himself. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am
There are some very nice and straightforward clarifications in the recent Federal Court decision inWarman v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:47 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:54 am
The quotes come directly from the three major fair dealing decisions: CCH Canadian, Access Copyright, and SOCAN v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
See R. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
It is possible to transfer rights to the underlying work via a self-executing smart contract when an NFT is sold, but a purchaser in most instances is merely buying an NFT resulting in ownership akin to buying a rare book—they own an autographed first edition copy of Lord of the Rings, but they do not own the copyrights to the underlying work. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:16 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Citing Campbell v Acuff and Sun Trust Bank v Houghton Mifflin, District Judge Batts lambasted any contention held by the defendants that 60 Years Later was a work of parodic comment or criticism: "the Court found such contentions to be post-hoc rationalizations employed through vague generalizations about the alleged naiveté of original, rather than reasonably perceivable parody. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:04 am
Judge Posner suggested something of this nature, positing in Gracen v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:06 am
See 3869130 Canada Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:00 pm
The fatty-food tax is inherently flawed because it is not the food itself that makes an individual fat, but the quantity consumed. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:38 am
And it’s not just the quantity, but the quality that has failed us. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
In my book, there is no way PNC Bank leaves empty-handed. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 11:33 am
In that case, authors objected to their books being scanned and used by Google to make a searchable database of books. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:48 am
ExeGi Pharma, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:47 pm
” (Greenman v. [read post]
