Search for: "Steele v. Starr" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
She Said, He Said
10 Mar 2008, 5:03 am
In my entry over the weekend, I described what I called the facts of Steele v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Round up of the Media Law Cases in the 2014-2015 legal year: Seven full trials, five libel appeals and two media privacy injunctions
4 Aug 2015, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
There were also three “damages” only trials: Sloutsker v Romanova, Johnson v Steele and ReachLocal v Bennett. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - http://inforrm.wordpress.com
First District Applies CEQA’s “Subsequent Review” Rules, Substantial Evidence Standard of Review; Upholds Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration and Modified Master Use Permit for Remote Buddhist Retreat
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Recent Law Review Articles -- November 2011
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm by Pace Law School Library
Steel Corp., 907 N.E.2d 1012, 2009.) 86 Ind. [read post]
PEN-e: Pace Environmental Notes - http://paceeenvironmentalnotes.blogspot.com/
Sixth District Holds City Of San Jose’s Action In Seeking And Accepting Streambed Alteration Agreement From California Department Of Fish And Wildlife Is Not New Discretionary Approval For City’s Historic Trestle Demolition/Bridge Construction Project, And Thus Does Not Trigger Subsequent CEQA Review
22 May 2020, 1:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Willow Glen Trestle Conservancy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The rise of certiorari before judgment
25 Jan 2022, 2:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
Less well noticed was a curious procedural feature of the second case, Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Sixth District Holds CEQA’s “Fair Argument” Test Inapplicable To City Of San Jose’s Discretionary Determination That 1922 Wooden Railroad Trestle Is Not Historical Resource
15 Aug 2016, 10:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Berkeley (2015) 60 Cal.4th 1086, by citing with approval therein the Fifth District’s decision in Valley Advocates v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Can You Clear Me Now? Sixth District Upholds Santa Cruz County’s CEQA Categorical Exemption For Project To Install Microcell Transmitters On Utility Poles In Rural Aptos Area
1 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm by Arthur F. Coon
(Save Our Carmel River v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Blockbuster watch: Affirmative action, same-sex weddings, and other big relists
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Nance v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Gordon College v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Kavanaugh on presidential power: Law-review article on investigations of sitting presidents
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm by Kevin Russell
Moreover, the article acknowledges that in Clinton v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
A Rebuttal to the Reckless Misrepresentation of Federal Medicaid Trust Law by the Office of Medicaid in Massachusetts
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
See Ware v. [read post]
Massachusetts Estate Planning, Probate & Elder Law - http://elderlaw.info/
A Rebuttal to the Reckless Misrepresentation of Federal Medicaid Trust Law by the Office of Medicaid in Massachusetts
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
See Ware v. [read post]
Massachusetts Estate Planning, Probate & Elder Law - http://elderlaw.info/