Search for: "Stein v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2008, 6:14 am
Stein, better known as the KPMG case. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:57 am
“A violation of Judiciary Law § 487 requires an intent to deceive (see Judiciary Law § 487), whereas a legal malpractice claim is based on negligent conduct” (Moormann v Perini & Hoerger, 65 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]). [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
On November 8, Sotomayor presided over a Supreme Court Historical Society re-enactment of Clay v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
Stein, see Kirk v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:40 am
The law does not prohibit, "in an absolute sense, the matter decided by the arbitrator" and his decision does not so violate of "well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law" as to offend public policy.Justice Cardona, with Justice Stein concurring, dissented, stating that “The state's strong public policy against retaliatory personnel actions is expressed by the enactment of whistleblowers' statutes such as Civil Service Law… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:57 am
The law does not prohibit, "in an absolute sense, the matter decided by the arbitrator" and his decision does not so violate of "well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law" as to offend public policy.Justice Cardona, with Justice Stein concurring, dissented, stating that "The state's strong public policy against retaliatory personnel actions is expressed by the enactment of whistleblowers' statutes such as Civil Service Law … [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 9:16 am
Related Cases: White v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
., v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am
Servs., LLC v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman LLP, 110 AD3d 426), rather than granting dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:53 am
Stein, the first U.S. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:27 pm
See Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc., MFSL GP, L.L.C., and MFSL Employee Investments, Ltd., v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 6:07 pm
Richland of Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland in Los Angeles. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:16 am
[Asadi v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
In vPersonalize Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 10:37 am
The case is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, UNITED STATES v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Kershaw, Charles Warren Center, Harvard University, “The Ascendance ofthe Neoliberal Political Order: A Triumph of Interests, Not Ideology”Reuel Schiller, University of California, Hastings College of the Law, “Beyond NewDeal Regulation: Neo-Liberalism and the Modern Administrative State”Commentator and Chair: Mary Furner, UCSBPlenary: Race in the Configuration and Reconfiguration of the New Deal Order Matt Garcia, Arizona State University, “The… [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 11:55 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
