Search for: "Steinmetz v. Steinmetz"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 8:44 am
Ravenell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:37 am
Last year, ShutterStock won a very similar lawsuit in Steinmetz v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 11:53 am
Schaller Duane Morris Takeaways: In Steinmetz et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Consider also Steinmetz v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:30 am
Case citation: Steinmetz v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
17 May 2020, 10:13 am
(Spoiler alert: not a happy ending, this time).United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
Steinmetz v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:53 am
Steinmetz v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
In Girard v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
In Girard v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
”Agin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 8:40 am
Additional Resources: Uber Challenges Class Action Lawsuit in New Motion, July 9, 2015, By Katy Steinmetz, TIME Magazine More Blog Entries: Rock v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:30 am
Since then, the picture has changed somewhat in relation to both Article 8 and the Data Protection Act: news organisations have raised concerns about the treatment of online search results, following the ECJ’s decision in Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González; the relationship between data protection and journalism was addressed in Steinmetz and others v Global Witness Limited;… [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
This issue did not need to be decided upon in CG v Facebook Ireland because the DPA was found not to apply. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 11:27 am
The UK Information Commissioner’s Officer (the “ICO”), in a letter to Global Witness (in Steinmetz and others v Global Witness) (the “Letter”), stated that non-media organisations may rely on the special-purposes exemption for journalism in s32 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (the “DPA”), to withhold personal data in response to Data Subject Access Requests. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Related articles Transitional Alimony Lowered in Clarksville Divorce: Russell v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 12:11 pm
” Zlatkiss v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 10:23 pm
Steinmetz v. [read post]