Search for: "Stephen R. Brown "
Results 1 - 20
of 711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Stephen T. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Christopher R. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
AN INTRODUCTION TO E. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, September 22, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of September 15-21, 2023 Financial Implications of Rising Political Risk in the US Posted by Stephen Davis (Harvard Law School), on Friday, September 15, 2023 Tags: C+C, CEOs, Presidential elections, US institutions In 2022, Corporate Time Horizons Shorten, Investors’ Lengthen… [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, September 22, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of September 15-21, 2023 Financial Implications of Rising Political Risk in the US Posted by Stephen Davis (Harvard Law School), on Friday, September 15, 2023 Tags: C+C, CEOs, Presidential elections, US institutions In 2022, Corporate Time Horizons Shorten, Investors’ Lengthen… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm
Recently, two lawyers wrote an article in a legal trade magazine about excluding epidemiologic evidence in civil litigation.[1] The article was wildly wide of the mark, with several conceptual and practical errors.[2] For starters, the authors discussed Rule 702 as excluding epidemiologic studies and evidence, when the rule addresses the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
R. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
AN INTRODUCTION TO E. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
16 May 2023, 2:51 am
Ian Lovett and Stephen Kalin report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Richman, John R. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Richman, John R. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Bollinger & Geoffrey R. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
” MARCH President Biden nominated Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson as a Justice of the Supreme Court to replace the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 8:58 am
The debate will feature Peter Conti-Brown, nonresident fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Economic Studies program; and Stephen G. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 12:00 am
Stephen Breyer. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Chris Walker had the great idea to assemble a bibliography on the major questions doctrine (MQD) so that we can have a one-stop shop for all things MQD. [read post]
