Search for: "Stephen Sachs" Results 181 - 200 of 385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2018, 12:40 pm by Alfred Brophy
Distinguished commentators for 2019 include: Jessica Bulman-Pozen John Harrison Aziz Huq Gillian Metzger Victoria Nourse Bertrall Ross Stephen Sachs All constitutional law scholars are invited to attend. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Hebei Welcome Pharmaceuticals: Court considered question of deference allowable to foreign law and we didn’t have a culture war about it [Amy Howe, SCOTUSBlog; Cassandra Burke Robertson and Stephen Sachs, Prawfs] Tags: antitrust, Cato Institute, Supreme Court, taxes Supreme Court roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Steven Sachs suggests that “one understated result of [the] travel-ban decision may be to hasten the demise of the universal injunction. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm by Samuel Bray
(Exceptions are posts by Stephen Sachs and Howard Wasserman.) [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:33 am by Howard Wasserman
Guests this year are Will Baude (Chicago), Daniel Epps (Wash U. and the First Mondays Podcast), Charlotte Garden (Seattle), Erica Goldberg (Dayton), Leah Litman (UC-Irvine), Andra Robertson (Case-Western) Stephen Sachs (Duke), Ian Samuel (Climenko headed to Indiana-Bloomington and the First Mondays Podcast), and Andrew Siegel (Seattle). [read post]
4 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Ceresney, Stephen Cutler, Robert Khuzami, Gary Lynch, William McLucas, Stanley Sporkin, Linda Thomsen, and Richard Walker. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am by Anthony Gaughan
Wuerth notes that in the 2015 case of Sachs v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:29 am by John Jascob
When the SEC brought charges against Goldman Sachs, there was a congressional investigation into whether the SEC did so just to get the Dodd-Frank Act passed, he remarked. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 10:40 am by Howard Bashman
“Brooding Omnipresence”: Law professor Stephen E. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Stephen Sachs urges the court to “develop a modern Fourth Amendment doctrine … [that] would recognize the legitimate claims of law enforcement but set objective boundaries — such as the duration of an intrusion or the nature of the data seized — that constrain those claims. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 7:14 pm
Sachs has this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
We agree with the diagnosis of important scholars in this field — from Richard Fallon and Cass Sunstein to Will Baude and Steve Sachs — but reject their proposed cures. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
LibertyMonika Bickert, Head of Product Policy and Counterterrorism, FacebookDana Boente, Acting Assistant Attorney General for National SecurityWalter Isaacson, President and CEO, The Aspen Institute Moderator: Ellen Nakashima, National Security Writer, The Washington Post   One State/Two StateAaron David Miller, Vice President for New Initiatives and Distinguished Scholar, the Woodrow Wilson International Center for ScholarsNatan Sachs, Director, Center for Middle East Policy,… [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 5:35 pm by Rick Hills
If you are a federalism nerd (I plead guilty), then you might also be familiar with the Full Faith & Credit argument in favor of this bill, a theory championed by Stephen Sachs, Randy Barnett, and Will Baude, based on Stephen Sachs' erudite and creative Virginia Law Review piece analyzing the history of Article IV's FF&C clause in the pre-constitutional period, the ratification debates, and the... [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In a column for Bloomberg View, Stephen Carter speculates on why the Supreme Court appears to be “all but leak-proof. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” PrawfsBlawg has commentary on the decision from Howard Wasserman here, Stephen Sachs here, and Cassandra Roberts [read post]