Search for: "Stephens v. Short"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
The oral argument yesterday morning in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 1:29 pm
In short, the decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am
Welcome, Lee and Stephen. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:31 am
In a short but carefully-structured opinion issued March 2, Judge Stephen Wilson of the Central District of California held that the plaintiffs’ claims do not “touch and concern” the United States with sufficient force to rebut the presumption against extraterritorial application of the ATS set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:32 am
U.S. and Connelly v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Reil v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 2:15 pm
(People v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
In short, Vázquez and Vladeck conclude that Montgomery dramatically upended the long-standing assumption that collateral review is a matter of legislative grace rather than constitutional compulsion. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:50 pm
In a very short nine-page opinion in Wilcox v. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 5:40 am
The weekend of November 4-5 was a little short on lawyer weddings in the New York Times wedding announcements. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
To start the ball rolling, Scotusblog solicited short comments (up to 2 paragraphs) from Erwin Chemerinsky, Dawn Johnsen, Ilya Shapiro, Stephen Presser, Adam Winkler, and me, among others.My answer to what the Supreme Court should do is:The Court should re-affirm Gibbons v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
When the M/V Galani hit the M/V Marina in the Paros-Antiparos Strait, a woman named Curtis with wounds most injurious brought suit in the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 1:10 pm
The short answer is they know that a refusal to mediate may well result in their being penalised in costs, even if they are subsequently successful at trial'[read more]For context read; Dunnett lives on - first thoughts on Halsey v Milton Keynes NHS [click on the title of this post to read more...] [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:58 am
© Hugh Stephens, 2020. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 10:30 am
In Ashcroft v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:23 pm
Erin Murphy, counsel in Barnett v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:01 am
The words “that was applicable” were analysed by the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in Regina v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:15 am
Justice Stephen G. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 2:52 am
Ross, “Short Circuit”, on Tennessee v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
The first is by Stephen Waddams, Introduction to the Study of Law, 6th ed. [read post]
