Search for: "Sterling v. Doe" Results 41 - 60 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The question was: what does the Article suggest is the significance of these dual roles? [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 6:21 am
On August 9, 2016, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued Lucia v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
It follows the May 2021 ruling of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 11:31 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 48082, Jan. 27, 2017), denied preliminary relief to a Christian inmate who objected on religious grounds to rules that prevent him from hanging a privacy sheet in his cell.In Sterling v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Doe, “[a] civil rights group is urging the nation’s highest court to overturn a lower-court ruling that said a Black Lives Matter organizer has no First Amendment defense to a lawsuit filed by a Baton Rouge officer who was injured while trying to arrest protesters after the 2016 killing of Alton Sterling. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:06 am
In the case of Standard Life Assurance Ltd v ACE European Ltd & 10 ORS [2012] EWHC 104 (Comm), Mr Justice Eder held that Standard Life Assurance Limited (SLAL) was entitled to recover under its professional indemnity insurance policies (the Policies) from the defendant insurers (the Insurers) in respect of remediation payments made following a significant fall in value of the Standard Life Pension Sterling Fund (the Fund).SLAL had marketed the Fund as a temporary home for short… [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 5:17 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Mascareignes Sterling Co Ltd v Chang Cheng Esquares Co Ltd (Mauritius), [2016] UKPC 21 Building contracts – fixed price contract – cost plus contract – extras Thomas G. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
The fact that the second half of clause 3(2) resulted in the service charge being a fixed sum was readily explicable by reference to the fact that it avoided disputes associated with determining a variable sum; Likewise, the provision for a fixed increase in the annual sum was also readily explicable: the parties assumed that the cost of providing the services in sterling terms would increase. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 8:55 pm by Jochen Vester (UK)
In PS26/20 the PRA provides feedback to responses to Consultation Paper 12/20: Capital Requirements Directive V (CP12/20) and Consultation Paper 17/20: Capital Requirements Directive V – further implementation (CP17/20). [read post]