Search for: "Sterling v. People"
Results 21 - 40
of 263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
Last summer, in Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 10:58 am
The recent UK case of Soriano v Forensic News and Others tested the territorial reach of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and represents the first UK judgment dealing with the territorial scope of the GDPR. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:34 am
that what we have here is coup v. coup. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 9:07 am
People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:12 pm
In Carpenter v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:55 am
(The decision in Horrocks v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm
He is currently an associate at Shearman & Sterling. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm
To be sure, there is general consensus that abortion should have limits, but the notion that the American people favor reversing Roe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am
Below, we have set out examples of how DMCA 1201 -- and its Mexican equivalent -- is incompatible with human rights, including free expression, self-determination, the rights of people with disabilities, cybersecurity, education, and archiving; as well as the law's consequences for Mexico's national resiliency and economic competitiveness and food- and health-security. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
[i] As a side note, all twenty were convicted and sentenced to between one and two years in prison, affirmed by People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
McDonald tried to plead for instructions from the advancing officers, asking them what they wanted people to do. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
As McClain describes, this back and forth was clearly on display in Loving v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:44 am
Supreme Court ruling that exempts people with intellectual disabilities from being executed[,] was granted parole on Monday. [read post]
23 May 2020, 5:38 pm
Sterling v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 2:06 pm
That seminal civil rights case, NAACP v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:31 am
This case involves people who worked for Sterling Jewelers who claim the company discriminated against them the basis of gender by paying them less money than male workers. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Some of those very people, however, said Esposito’s claims are greatly embellished, or simply not true. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 1986 in Meritor v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
” Adding to the old adage of people, process and tech is a smart move. [read post]
