Search for: "Steve C. Person v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 2:47 am by Robert Tanha
Altman's case, Corrick J. emphasized that the employer's actions had to be viewed in the context of the employee's age, length of service, state of health and relationship with Steve's Music. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:13 am by MBettman
On June 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Steve Granger, et al. v Auto-Owners Insurance, et al., 2013-1527. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:07 am by Jeff Welty
Under the state constitution, as interpreted in State v. [read post]
The so-called ‘consent clause’ of Section 2(c), which requires written consent in order to use the name of living persons in a trademark, has been controversial among intellectual property attorneys and First Amendment legal scholars for some time. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:22 pm by Ilya Somin
Here is Steve's comment: The conventional scholarly wisdom is that the Article IV Full Faith and Credit Clause doesn't, on its own, compel interstate recognition of marriages, because at the end of the day, a state's definition of marriage is just an expression of statutory policy, and the Supreme Court has long said that FF&C does not mean states are obligated to defer to the policy ideas of other states. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Section 1052(c) requires Steve Elster but not Trump to obtain third-party permission to register "Trump Too Small. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 2:25 pm
Reporting on yesterday's COA decision in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
As evidenced by the court’s decision against Innkeeper, the use of a property by a 501(c)(3) entity as a residence without quantitative evidence of its use in connection with its stated charitable mission defeats a claim for property tax exemption in Ohio.This blog is presented by Steve Richman, Esq. and Connie Carr, Esq. of Kohrman Jackson & Krantz P.L.L. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am by Dave
(c)  Even where the person loses the status of worker, the question of whether that person is an unreasonable burden to a host member state’s social assistance system requires an individual overall assessment “of the specific burden which granting that benefit would place on the national social assistance system as a whole, by reference to the personal circumstances characterising the individual situation of the person… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]