Search for: "Steve Salop"
Results 61 - 66
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Daniel Sokol Steve Salop (Georgetown Law) has a very interesting piece, An Administrable and Efficient Legal Standard for Refusals to Deal and Price Squeezes by an Unregulated, Vertically Integrated Monopolist. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Daniel Sokol Steve Salop (Georgetown Law) has a very interesting piece, An Administrable and Efficient Legal Standard for Refusals to Deal and Price Squeezes by an Unregulated, Vertically Integrated Monopolist. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:42 am
Alex Tabarrok reviews economic growth textbooks and recommends this one Ribstein on the proxy access battles Private antitrust litigation is increasing quickly (picture here) — I’m setting the over/under for 2010 at 1600 cases Steve Salop on the appropriate Section 2 rule of reason standard for refusal to deal and price squeezes by unregulated, vertically integrated monopolists Some economics of airline wi-fi including the interesting fact that the wi-fi service… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 9:23 pm
I’ve just returned from Sydney where I was at the ICANN meetings giving a presentation (with Steve Salop of Georgetown Law) and participating in a Q&A on the potential economic consequences of vertical integration between registries and registrars. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
He joins Bob Pitosfsky and Steve Salop. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 9:17 pm
Virtually every antitrust scholar to examine the goals of the Sherman Act, including those who disagree with Bork’s “consumer welfare” (read: total welfare) interpretation, have concluded that the antitrust laws represented a myriad of goals including: economic efficiency, protection of (a la Steve Salop) “true” consumer welfare, and political concerns. [read post]
