Search for: "Steven Johnson v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2018, 12:35 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Burden-shifting language A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City acquitted appellant Steven Johnson of first-degree murder, but convicted him of conspiracy to commit murder, second-degree murder, use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence, carrying a handgun, possession of a ... [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:35 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Criminal Procedure Out-of-court identifications; self-representation; Confrontation Clause Steven Johnson, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery by threat of force pursuant to Wis. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
Stevens writing for himself and Breyer continued a theme started in his 1995 dissent to Lackey v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:58 am
Stevens, Johnson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:40 am
The transcript in Johnson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 7:03 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989) gave Lockett a broad reading, but Johnson v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
’ ” Stevens’ thoughts no doubt reminded some observers of his dissent in the 1989 case, Johnson v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:00 pm by Matt Sundquist
Johnson (6:51), Stevens pointedly responded to an advocate who claimed that the government cannot regulate how flags are displayed, saying “I feel quite differently. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
S. 463 (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, e. g., Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 6:57 pm by Amy Howe
In 1970, Stevens was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
S. 463 (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, e. g., Johnson v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 12:46 pm by Jenny Rempel
” Meanwhile, Justice Thomas responded against Stevens saying there was no support for his argument and that the state would never be able to please Stevens’ conditions for justice because of Stevens’ previously-held opinions against the death penalty.Meanwhile on December 7, Franklin E. [read post]