Search for: "Steven Mazie"
Results 141 - 160
of 530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2018, 3:58 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie considers Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s decision not to join Thomas in voting to hear the cases, suggesting that “it is no particular surprise that Justice Kavanaugh is cultivating a low profile, heading off conflicts involving poor women’s access to reproductive health services so early in his tenure,” and cautioning that “[t]t would be a mistake to read too much into a single vote… [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:20 am
” Additional coverage comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog and Bill Lucia at Route Fifty. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:20 am
For The Economist, Steven Mazie reports after Wednesday’s oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie reports that during Tuesday’s oral argument in Carpenter v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie writes that a “rare left-right coalition of anti-poverty activists, Christian conservatives and libertarians supports Mr Timbs against cities and states that grab upwards of $250m a year in questionable forfeits. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at the legal challenges to the appointment of Matthew Whitaker as deputy attorney general, including one that “comes in the guise of Michaels v Sessions, a case challenging the federal ban on guns for convicted felons that has seen its caption change to Michaels v Whitaker” during the cert petition stage. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 6:58 am
Steven D. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:57 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that “[t]he heart of the conflict—whether it is feasible to distribute funds across so many millions of individuals—may not find a resolution,” because “[s]everal justices—led by the ideologically incompatible but increasingly chummy Elena Kagan and Neil Gorsuch—wondered whether the plaintiffs have requisite standing to sue. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:12 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that the issue in the court’s most recent grant, Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:14 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie reports that the case “boils down to how harshly the government can treat immigrants,” and that “all nine justices struggled to interpret a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) hinging on the meaning of ‘when’—and were split over how to read it. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
” For The Economist, Steven Mazie explains that “[i]n the short run, the 114th justice’s impact will not be earth-shaking,” because a “docket of smaller-stakes cases this year … limits the potential impact of Justice Kavanaugh’s ascent to the Supreme Court,” but that “the newly entrenched right-leaning majority will eventually find an appetite for cases with openings to push American law in their direction. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
” Additional coverage of the argument in Weyerhaeuser comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Bill Mears at Fox News, and Ellen Gilmer at E&E News, who reports that “justices from both ends of the ideological spectrum pushed to understand just where the limits are on the government’s authority. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
” At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie notes that “this year’s 43 pending cases are less ideologically fraught than last term’s. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:53 am
” For The Economist, Steven Mazie observes that the cases on the new term’s docket “may not grab headlines,” but that “important questions loom,” and that “[i]n their first week back the justices will hear arguments on the fate of an endangered amphibian, the separation of powers and whether a man with a mental illness can be executed. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:01 am
Steven Mazie, Supreme Court correspondent for The Economist, covered the speech on Twitter and a print account by Rob Abruzzese at the Brooklyn Daily Eagle confirms the same general points. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:17 am
— Steven Mazie (@stevenmazie) September 12, 2018 [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:25 am
” For The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at the opening day of the hearing, when “the torpor of the typical opening-day hearing was broken” as Democrats objected to what they considered an unacceptably truncated and hasty production of documents from Kavanaugh’s days in the George W. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:16 am
” More previews of the hearing come from Brent Kendall for The Wall Street Journal, Byron Tau, also for the Journal, Lisa Mascaro at the Associated Press, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Espresso blog, Sheryl Gay Stolberg for The New York Times, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Emily Cochrane for The New York Times, and Richard Wolf for USA Today, who also highlights the “five major controversies” surrounding the nomination here. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 7:55 am
” Commentary on the case comes from Steven Mazie of The Economist, who suggests that “with a possible 4-4 split between the court’s liberals and conservatives before Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed by the Senate, and five votes needed to reverse a lower-court ruling, anti-gerrymandering activists see a tantalising window of opportunity. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:54 am
” Steven Mazie of The Economist discusses the “permutations [that] would ultimately trigger appeals and requests for emergency relief from the Supreme Court” concerning DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which “provides undocumented immigrants who arrived in America as children and meet other requirements renewable two-year reprieves from deportation and permits to work legally. [read post]
