Search for: "Stevens v. Little" Results 1 - 20 of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm by Erin Miller
  Little worked with Justice Stevens in the 1984 Supreme Court Term. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:14 pm by Tony Mauro
That rule was a mistake, Stevens said, especially given that political pressure gives prosecutors little incentive to train their underlings on Brady. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:04 pm by Erin Miller
As in Kyllo and PGA Tour, Stevens’ analysis in Bush v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am by Guest Author
 That little test that Justice Stevens drafted in an afternoon became the face of administrative law for forty years. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm by Erin Miller
  Stevens “both began and ended his career on the Court as a strong enforcer of prosecutorial ethics,” as Rory Little argues. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
Justice Stevens joined the Court soon after Furman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am by Kate Shaw
Justice Stevens: Of course, some of the memories, the [District of Columbia v.] [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:35 am by Steve Hall
That rule was a mistake, Stevens said, especially given that political pressure gives prosecutors little incentive to train their underlings on Brady. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am by Anna Christensen
At the time of his appointment, there was little reason to think that Justice Stevens’ deep methodological commitments portended much about his substantive views or relative position on the Court’s ideological spectrum. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 7:17 am by David Oscar Markus
On Thursday, when Justice John Paul Stevens read at length from his stinging 90-page dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:32 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Justice Stevens is, after all, also the author of Chevron v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Lyrissa Lidsky
As readers of this blog probably know by now, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
”  And Stevens echoed a point made by Justice Stephen Breyer in his dissent in McCutcheon v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 8:33 am
And, as I've said before, I think Justice Stevens got it right, but calling it "the Supremacy Clause in Article V" makes me feel a little sorry for it. [read post]