Search for: "Stevens v. Little"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,661
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
Steven Rubin started prescribing plaintiff Reglan (the brand drug of metoclopramide) or a generic version of the drug manufactured by PLIVA, Inc. to treat her gastroparesis. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
District Court Judge Steven C. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Steffel v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
So Russia wants Ukraine back in the USSR, while Ukrainians insist that they can get by with a little help from our friends. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
Seale, 558 U.S. 985, 985 (2009) (Stevens, J., respecting the dismissal of the certified question, joined by Scalia, J.). [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
” There is no doubt that Hasen’s proposed amendment would cure, for once and for all, the lacunae announced (and embraced) by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Fortunately, at least one county employee thought that breaking the law must be a little more complicated than that, and this person went to Breaking Through News to blow the whistle. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
The Justice Department leaves little doubt why they pursued Baker. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Robert Stevens, The Laws of Restitution (2023). [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
That little test that Justice Stevens drafted in an afternoon became the face of administrative law for forty years. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
They’d look for some little snippet of text in the Lanham Act; Scalia was a textualist but he could read a law in its entirety. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
I find little persuasive force in Judge Sentelle’s concurrence, and I don’t think his rephrasing of the “relevant question” changes anything. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
"Beyond this, little else is clear," concludes Lash. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
In 2002, in Ashcroft v. [read post]
