Search for: "Stevens v. Stevens" Results 201 - 220 of 11,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2023, 4:33 pm by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
This editorial by Steven Hill (Democracy SOS) reflects on the implications of the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Pico Neighborhood Association v City of Santa Monica–the the first California Voting Rights Act case to reach the state’s Supreme… Continue reading The post “A new and better California Voting Rights Act” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Shill (University of Iowa), on Monday, October 16, 2023 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Shill (University of Iowa), on Monday, October 16, 2023 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:18 am
  My prior blog post https://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2023/10/upcoming-limits-on-fcc-statutory.html noted that an expansive reading of West Virginia. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:18 am
  My prior blog post https://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2023/10/upcoming-limits-on-fcc-statutory.html noted that an expansive reading of West Virginia. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am by SHG
Berkeley law prof Steven Davidoff Solomon wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal warning prospective legal employers not to hire “some” of his students if they “don’t want to hire people who advocate hate and practice discrimination. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm by Rik Lambers (Brinkhof)
While the G2/21 status quo may start to crystallize in Dutch case law, this raises a question – in view of e.g. the pending Fibrogen v Akabia UK SC appeal – for the English court: Quo vadis? [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Finchett-Maddock & Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, To Open Up: A performative rewriting of Pendragon v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR CD 179 , (Helen Dancer, Bonnie Holligan and Helena Howe (eds.) [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Despite these “very significant efforts,” District Judge Steven Jonas ultimately found that the pair had been reckless in causing damage which was not “minor or trivial” to repair and ordered a conditional discharge and compensation. [read post]