Search for: "Stevens v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 4,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
  A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
 This is dispositive proof that the Presidency is also not an "office *** under the United States" for the purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The post Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
We have recorded 2,403 communities using identity disclosure versus 2,196 reverse sting operations in cities and counties across the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am by SHG
Making videos of small animals being crushed by high heels may be protected First Amendment activity (really, see United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:56 am by Steven Calabresi
Barr, together with me and B.U. law professor Gary Lawson, and with Citizens United, joined an amicus brief that was filed yesterday on Donald Trump's side in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:54 am
 The entire regulatory process of the United States government is about to get upended. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]