Search for: "Stewart v. Peters" Results 1 - 20 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:46 am
Stewart, reviewing The Death of Treaty Supremacy: An Invisible Constitutional Change, by David L. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
Anderson sat down with Peter Swire, professor of law and ethics at the Scheller College of Business at the Georgia Institute of Technology and himself a former privacy official in the Clinton and Obama administrations, and Stewart Baker, currently of counsel at Steptoe & Johnson and previously the assistant secretary for policy at the Department of Homeland Security during the George W. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Post By Tina G Yin-Sowatzke Oral arguments commenced on October 7, 2019 in Peter v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
Stewart, reviewing Jurisdictional Immunities of States and International Organizations, by Edward Chukwuemeke Okeke David A. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
"  New online from the American Journal of Legal History and Oxford Academic: Victorian Railways Commissioners v Coultas: The Untold Story, by Peter Handford. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:36 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Federal Republic of Germany Daniele Amoroso & Riccardo Pavoni, Stergiopoulos v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:54 pm by Ronald Mann
The first morning of the term showed a welcome moment of camaraderie on the bench, as justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum seemed to join in their skepticism of the government’s position in Peter v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:53 am by Alex R. McQuade
Robert Chesney provided us with another Apple v. [read post]