Search for: "Stewart v. State of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
County of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 717-719, 93 S.Ct. 1785, 36 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973) (holding that California counties are not arms of the state or alter egos of the state for purposes of diversity jurisdiction), overruled in part by Monell v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:55 am
(Gregg v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 11:47 am
Indeed, under the standard set forth in Roth v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 8:50 am
NewsTerry Stewart: Invisible to many, a key player in trial, 01/31/10 Keen News ServiceAt heart of Prop. 8 trial, a fight over nurturing kids, 01/30/10 Sacramento BeeProp 8 witnesses debate scholarship on families, 01/30/10 Keen News ServiceRelated NewsExclusive cineGLAAD Video: Dustin Lance Black, Joe Solmonese, and Reed Cowan Discuss 8: The Mormon Proposition, 01/29/10 glaadBLOG'8: The Mormon Proposition': Audacious look at church's role in gay-marriage ban, 01/30/10… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
That Arizona, not California, had UCCJEA home state jurisdiction over child custody. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Desserts, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Stewart, 2016 U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:21 pm
United States Ninth Circuit, 03/25/2011 Stewart and Jasper Orchards v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Logically, it would be up to the losing defendant to seek a stay, and that would be the State of California. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
” Jacobellis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 6:11 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 1:52 pm
Finding no controlling state precedent that resolves these issues, the Ninth Circuit asked the California high court to exercise its discretion to accept and decide the certified questions (Stewart v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
(See State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
It says “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:26 am
Stewart, 563 U. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
In Scher v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
In Gion v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
Supreme Court found that the California parole statute was not an Ex Post Facto law in California Dept. of Corrections v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:49 am
” In commentary for the U-T San Diego, Damien Schiff urges the Court to grant review in Stewart & Jasper Orchards v. [read post]
